|
| Tools For Webmasters Shareware and freeware tools for evaluating your websites performance and rankings. |
 |
|
03-20-2006, 11:30 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 887
|
WYSIWYG Editors
We all know that the two most popular WYSIWYG Editors are DreamWeaver and FrontPage.
I have noted some pretty substantial improvements by Microsoft with their latest version of FrontPage but haven’t seen that much from DreamWeaver.
Has anyone else noticed this, and do you know of another WYSIWYG Editor that you think competes with the Top 2 Editors?
~VegasMack
|
|
|
03-20-2006, 11:44 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Status: Senior Real Estate Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 140
|
Not meaning to sound stupid, but what is a WYSIWYG Editor?
Thanks in advance,
Josh
|
|
|
03-20-2006, 12:11 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 887
|
Hi Josh,
The ONLY stupid questions here are the ones that don’t get asked.
WYSIWYG = What You See Is What You Get
Which means just as it implies. When you build a page with a WYSIWYG Editor you are looking at pretty much the final version (or what the Visitor to the site sees).
Hope that helps,
~VegasMack
|
|
|
03-20-2006, 12:14 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Status: Senior Real Estate Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 140
|
Oh, I see.
BTW – Is there a difference in search engine rankings using one WYSIWYG editor over another one?
Thanks Mack!
Josh
|
|
|
03-20-2006, 12:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Status: Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 887
|
Josh,
I don’t think there is any real difference between the Top 2 WYSIWYG Editors in search engine rankings.
While DreamWeaver produces cleaner coding, FrontPage has been used to generate just as many Real Estate sites in the Top 10 of the 3 major search engines.
I really think it boils down to preference. FrontPage is a lot easier to learn with nowhere near the learning curve of DreamWeaver.
~VegasMack
|
|
|
03-23-2006, 07:42 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Status: Senior Real Estate Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 140
|
Thanks Mack. I appreciate it.
|
|
|
03-23-2006, 10:04 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Status: SEO Expert
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hilton Head Island, SC
Posts: 408
|
When I was first learning HTML I used FrontPage. But once I understood proper HTML coding I saw that the code generated by FP was really bloated. Also, I use so much CSS in my designs that it never renders correctly in the Normal and Preview tabs.
On a lark I gave Dreamweaver a try, but it was EXTREMELY slow. And in order to try and use their shortcuts their was a huge learning curve.
So no I code everything by hand instead of drag and drop or WYSIWIG. Since most of my formatting and layout is actually controlled by CSS I don't really have use for a WYSIWYG editor.
I do use FrontPage for one thing. I drop my code in the HTML tab to see if I missed any open tags or elements. I set my normal text, tags, scripts, and other items all as different colors in the HTML tab. If I leave a tag or element open it's easy to see where I messed up.
No matter what anyone chooses to use for coding, I suggest always running your code through an HTML validator. It helps to ensure that your HTML is cross browser compatible (CSS is another story) and it teaches you good coding habits.
|
|
|
04-21-2006, 03:11 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Status: Senior Real Estate Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 140
|
Thanks for the heads up HHI Golf Guy. I appreciate it, definitely food for thought.
|
|
|
05-11-2006, 05:24 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Status: Real Estate Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HHI Golf Guy
When I was first learning HTML I used FrontPage. But once I understood proper HTML coding I saw that the code generated by FP was really bloated. Also, I use so much CSS in my designs that it never renders correctly in the Normal and Preview tabs.
On a lark I gave Dreamweaver a try, but it was EXTREMELY slow. And in order to try and use their shortcuts their was a huge learning curve.
So no I code everything by hand instead of drag and drop or WYSIWIG. Since most of my formatting and layout is actually controlled by CSS I don't really have use for a WYSIWYG editor.
I do use FrontPage for one thing. I drop my code in the HTML tab to see if I missed any open tags or elements. I set my normal text, tags, scripts, and other items all as different colors in the HTML tab. If I leave a tag or element open it's easy to see where I messed up.
No matter what anyone chooses to use for coding, I suggest always running your code through an HTML validator. It helps to ensure that your HTML is cross browser compatible (CSS is another story) and it teaches you good coding habits.
|
Good advice HHI. The best way to learn is to do it by hand but you don't need to do it all by hand. For anyone interested in css/xhtml here is a good css generator that includes many IE hacks:
http://csscreator.com/version2/maketemplate.php
for a variety of css menus:
http://accessify.com/tools-and-wiza...s/list-o-matic/
and a good text editor:
NoteTab (a free word editor) has clip libraries for html and css which makes it a snap to code content for pages and style sheets.
|
|
|
05-11-2006, 06:15 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Status: Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in a house
Posts: 374
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VegasMack
We all know that the two most popular WYSIWYG Editors are DreamWeaver and FrontPage.
I have noted some pretty substantial improvements by Microsoft with their latest version of FrontPage but haven’t seen that much from DreamWeaver.
Has anyone else noticed this, and do you know of another WYSIWYG Editor that you think competes with the Top 2 Editors?
~VegasMack
|
VegasMack, my own personal experience is that people often bag on Dreamweaver because it has IDE features that go way beyond the simple editor features in FrontPage and they dont understand them. Then I see people bag on FrontPage because the markup is real bad and the features appeal so much to newbe types because it came with their MS Office Suite and it has some template generators in it.
So all the pro's (at least all those that are honestly pro's) know to use professional IDE environments over page generators like FP. Is FP bad? No, I wouldn't call it bad but I'd never use it because as always anything developed by Microsoft is designed to benefit Microsofts mind set and way of thinking.
Dreamweaver along with things like GoLive for instance have IDE features (IDE = Integrated Development Environment) in which the ease it can communicate with things like Databases and then show real time results in a way that makes sense to both Developers and Designers sets them apart. Previously, or maybe currently, designers and developers speak different languages, but Dreamweaver opens a foundation of common ground for understanding each other.
Dreamweaver also has real nice extensions available for it that extend Dreamweaver in unique directions. KPT and others have developed full blown shopping cart extensions that make ecommerce site creation an afternoon event instead of a months long one.
My money says use Dreamweaver......
Just my 2 /cents
Jared
Last edited by Jared : 05-11-2006 at 06:18 PM.
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Member Login
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 763
Total Threads: 2,564
Total Posts: 14,250
There are 271 users
currently browsing forums.
Forum Sponsor:
Advertising:
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|