The prohibition against the unauthorized use of information on the Megan's Law Web site does not in itself qualify registered sex offenders as a class protected from housing discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (the "Act"). That was the opinion recently rendered by California's Attorney General Bill Lockyer on April 27, 2006.
As background, the Department of Justice makes available, through its Brought to you by the California Association of REALTORSŪ
Megan's Law Web site, access to information about registered sex offenders. The law, however, prohibits the use of this information for purposes relating to, among other things, housing or accommodations, loans, credit, or employment, except to protect a person at risk or as authorized by law.
The Attorney General was asked to render an opinion as to whether this prohibition against unauthorized use qualified registered sex offenders as a class protected from housing discrimination. The Attorney General concluded that it did not. "Registered sex offenders may be subject to housing discrimination 'to protect a person at risk' and as authorized by 'any provision of law,' but for no other reason," according to the Attorney General. "Under the Act, on the other hand, a claimant falling under a non-enumerated classification must satisfy the three-prong Harris test to prove unlawful housing discrimination in the particular circumstances" (citing Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal. 3d 1142). Briefly, the three-prong Harris test involves whether a claim of discrimination is based on a classification involving personal characteristics, whether the alleged discriminatory act at issue serves a legitimate business interest, and what the policy considerations are.
The Attorney General's opinion in this matter is fully set forth at its Web site at
http://ag.ca.gov/opinions/published/05-301.pdf. Opinions of the Attorney General are not binding law, but they are entitled to great respect by the courts.